Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

One of the first things that was soon to became apparent, is that this astonishing story has gone completely global, and as a direct result of its international infamy, it has unfortunately created a tsunami of inconsistencies, rumours, discrepancies, falsehoods and conspiracy theories. Some of the most outlandish and yet quite common suggestions is that the Eriksson twins are either programmed assassins, MK-Ultra victims or perhaps simply Super Strength Soldiers.  Others believe they are clones, aliens, reptilian hybrids or must be consumed by some form of demonic possession.  Whereas many people have suggested that the twins were under the influence of drugs, whether with or without their knowledge, i.e. their drinks, food or even cigarettes were spiked or laced with a mind altering substance.  According to the police and the reports, they claim there was no evidence of drugs found in their blood.  Though we reveal what really would have taken place in regards to the blood tests the twins were meant to have undergone, and prove this wasn’t really the case.  It must be said, as basically these are among the main reasons why investigative journalist Sharon Mackellar and I, in the capacity of an “amateur criminologist” and writer, decided to join forces and take on the challenge to dissect this matter further than anyone else has done so to date.  The contents of this book is a direct result and culmination of an investigation which has sent us down a whole myriad of rabbit holes that in turn led us onto a series of corridors and places that has brought us directly into contact with many individuals, groups, organisations and authoritative bodies, that from the very start of our task we really had no idea would turn out to be the case.  In the following chapters we have fully examined all the points that have been raised and accrued from our investigations and we’re pleased to say we’ve been able to shed so much more light on what really did happened to the Eriksson twins and to Glenn Hollinshead. 

 

     We can confidently say that no one else should be able to surpass what we have achieved in relation to this case.  Unless of course the ‘court bundle’ [the police evidence], is revealed in its entirety by the police.  Perhaps one of the best things about our explorations into this case is that we have hopefully been able to put to bed the abundance of weird and wacky theories that have arisen due to the countless number of unanswered questions the afore mentioned documentaries seemed to create.  We’ve tried to mirror what is claimed within these films, in the sense that we have revisited the areas in question and tracked down and re-interviewed the main witnesses and people involved in those programmes.

 

     We have spent in excess of 4,000 unpaid man hours on this investigation.  We have personally funded ourselves in every capacity within this time, we are responsible for the earnings of the film and all the costs involved in producing your own budget making documentary film.  Hundreds of phone calls have been made, with dozens of letters written and sent to many people.  Extortionate train fares and car journeys up and down the country, with fuel, food and accommodation costs to take into consideration, have all had to be paid for.  We are far from wealthy people, we are in fact ordinary working-class people, who as a collective have come together in a shared common interest, which is to help expose the truth.  Considering our personal time, we have been lucky enough to have had help from others, such as Sharon’s mother who helped trawl the internet for clues, and our elderly fathers who proofread our findings and text.  There’s all the time and effort put in by the Hollinshead family among others who have spent many hours burning the midnight oil trying to help us get to the bottom of this.  This is not including the time we have spent and continue to spend working on the forthcoming documentary. 

 

     Fortunately, I am able to understand many aspects of criminal law and the procedures involved, otherwise the legal bill to date would be in the region of many thousands of pounds had the Hollinshead family or ourselves, had to employ the services of a solicitor and barrister, has been required in this case.  I have worked as a representative in the capacity of a ‘McKenzie Friend’ [explanation follows], for the Hollinshead family in this case.  I have had to contact all the legal teams and people involved in the trial, whether it was the defence or prosecution solicitors and barristers, they have all been approached.  Including the judges, the Crown Prosecution Service [CPS], the Independent Police Complaints Commission [IPCC], Merseyside Police, Staffordshire Police and their legal representatives, known as the Professional Standards Departments [PSDs], the University Hospital of North Staffordshire [UHNS], and the Stoke-on-Trent Coroner’s office.   

 

     I decide to include these such figures and details for two main reasons, one being it’s important to establish how far and wide we have investigated this matter, and two, because unbelievably and without our knowledge or consent, it was unintentionally leaked out by Jon Hollinshead, that this book was going to be released.  We now understand he didn’t mean any malice, he misunderstood the release date and mentioned it on a internet forum too soon.  There was a great response, many saying they couldn’t wait for the book to come out.  Though incredibly, there have already been people whom we can only assume are trolls, for we are without doubt going to come under fire from those whose objective is to debase and try to undermine our findings, who are trying to stir-up some trouble on the forums.  They oddly question why are we selling the book, and not giving it away?  Forgetting that’s what all publishers, authors and journalists do in order to make their living, as how else do they expect them to survive?  We’re not funded or paid by some huge corporate or government organisation, who arguably should in fact be doing what we have done.  We understand the majority of sensible people know this is how the world works and this is not really the reason I am raising this matter.  I just wish to point out, that there are people out there with a hidden agenda, and persons raising such an objective has to be viewed with caution.  They are clearly not interested in the incriminating evidence we have unearthed, but more concerned about attacking us as individuals and trying to portray we’re some kind of money orientated group of greedy people.  This type of indirect attack is classic black propaganda; it’s a distraction technique that often can be seen deployed on the internet when someone from one particular camp or group may come out with some sort of controversial statement, such as accusing someone like “Sir” Jimmy Savile of being a paedophile.  It goes without saying, out of those who have for decades been disillusioned and hoodwinked by him, would descend in their droves, along with all the many other paedophiles, who too would like to get their pennyworths in.  Word would spread and they will gradually descend like a flock of Vulture’s on whatever the forum and will ignore the actually accusations of the hundreds of witnesses and evidence, as they prefer to home-in on the person making the comment instead, then accusing them of either being a conspiracy freak, paranoid, mad or an attention seeker, or a money-grabber out to seek compensation.               

 

     According to the Hollinshead brothers, they ended up viewing DC Short, the police family liaison officer, as a “Spy in the camp.”  They said they were promised the ‘Court Bundle’, which is/was the collated evidence of the case, that apparently Mr Christopher Hotten QC, acting for the Crown, said he couldn’t see there being a problem and indicated that DC Short would arrange this for the family, yet it never materialised.  They ask; “Why hasn’t it?”  I put this question to Mr Hotten QC, and he told me he couldn’t help us if he wanted to, as the ‘Court Bundle’ had been returned to the CPS.  I contacted the CPS and they informed me all the paperwork was the ‘property’ of the Staffordshire Police.  I then approached the Staffordshire Police’s legal department and cited the Freedom of Information Act [FOIA], though they insisted the Hollinshead family would have to employ a solicitor to help them in the matter.  This is one of the reasons why we decided to go to the IPCC. 

 

     On the 31st August 2012, the Staffordshire PSDs has confirmed that; ‘DC Short does not recall assurances of such certainty’ that the family would be given a copy of the court bundle.  ‘DC Short says that his only memory was that Mr Hotton may have suggested that some of the case papers may be available but that this was later viewed by the police as not being possible.’  In regards to now furnishing the Hollinshead family with a copy of the court bundle in 2012, they said: ‘This information is not, as a matter of course, on grounds which include legal reasons, made available to family members.  Staffordshire Police declines to provide a copy of the court bundle.’  Though we have to argue this isn’t really the case, for had this investigation and trial been correctly conducted and heard, which means the case should have been carried out in front of a jury, then every single part of the ‘court bundle’ would have been seen and heard by the public. [Unless of course the police wanted to suppress certain details being aired in front of those sitting in the public gallery and the media in general.]  There would have been no reason for the police to object to the Hollinshead family seeing the court bundle.  This kind of denial by the police seems to indicate there is perhaps something within that court bundle that will reveal something detrimental to the police, for why else would they object to handing a copy over?  It appears so desperate were the police in not wanting to reveal the original court bundle, that this is perhaps the real reason why Sabina’s “Murder” charge, was then sixteen months later reduced to a “Manslaughter” charge, with her agreeing to plead guilty, despite maintaining her innocence up until this period of time.  A jury was never required, they never got to see or hear the court bundle of evidence, thus Sabina’s case was dealt with without the need to call any witnesses and for them to be cross-examined.  And this is why the court bundle is so crucial in this case and why an enquiry needs to be called for.          

                                                       

     Up to the time of writing, the IPCC have handed the complaints over to the relevant PSDs, and each of the police forces involved are looking into the complaints to see whether the matter will be ‘recorded’.  Merseyside Police have since confirmed they have ‘recorded the complaint’, and told me they are looking into it.  Also on the 31st August 2012, the Staffordshire police force have said they have not currently ‘recorded’ it.  This may result in the Hollinshead family going back to the IPCC and appeal for the case to be investigated by them.  We were worried this would be the case with the Merseyside police, for before they agreed to ‘record’ the complaint, they wrote on the 25th July 2012, that stated: ‘In the event that the issues raised are over twelve months old it will be classed as out of time and we may seek dispensation from the IPCC.’  Obviously it’s well over twelve months, and seeking dispensation in this instance, means they would be asking the IPCC to exempt them from the complaints procedure.  The Hollinshead family would have needed to appeal to the IPCC to instigate their own investigation had the Merseyside Police force refused to ‘record it’. 

 

     We have a copy of a film that clearly shows what I’ve already mentioned, that these two women were in fact first diagnosed as “Mental Patients” under a special clause in the 1983 Mental Health Act.  We hope that our own investigation into this case will be of some help and assistance to the IPCC and the police, which is why we’ve furnished them with copies of our 10 page [A4] report and findings into the matter for their consideration.  Yet despite us mentioning this evidence to the PSD of Staffordshire Police, they have since replied, also on the 31st August 2012; This doesn’t bode well for the police, for as you’ll see we will prove that the arresting officer and his superior did indeed agree with each other that the Eriksson twins should be “arrested” under this special clause within the 1983 Mental Health Act.  And that so much so was this matter a concern to the police, it appears they requested the BBC-Mentorn Productions to edit out and remove this damming evidence, which was accordingly done.  This vital piece of evidence, which we have since supplied a copy of to the Staffordshire Police force, was leaked by someone who appears to have been concerned as to why was it edited out of the original film in the first place?  So we have to question, who directly requested this evidence to be removed from the original documentary?  In addition, why do the Staffordshire Police Records have no mention of this fact?     

 

     It wasn’t until my recent intervention, when I telephoned DCI Dave Garrett of the Staffordshire police and enquired why hadn’t Glenn’s personal property been returned after four years, then I don’t think it would ever have been.  Though to be fair to DCI Garrett, he took immediate action and got the property returned in no time at all.  Then following on from his previous comments on this subject matter, [which are quoted further on], we decided to contact the Stoke-on-Trent MP, Rob Flello, and hold him to the words he said back in 2009, which was he was calling for enquiry into; ‘...why was Sabina Eriksson released from hospital so soon?’, so we are now pleased to be able to announce that he has agreed to come-on-board and help the Hollinshead family by seeking an enquiry via the House of Parliament, and said he shall raise the matter when the House of Commons reopens following the 2012 summer recess.  We have also discovered that when Sabina appeared at Fenton Magistrate Court, Stoke-on-Trent, just 36 hours later on the 19th May 2008, ‘no’ Pre-Sentence Report [PSR] was called for by the magistrate.  Had the magistrate insisted on one, as is the normal standard procedure in such cases, and the same could be said about Sabina being released from the hospital to early, then it has to be disputed that Glenn Hollinshead would in all probability still be alive today.

 

     From the very on start of our investigation we’ve had the full backing and cooperation of the Hollinshead family, with some of the brothers appearing in the forthcoming documentary film: A Madness Shared by Two, which is currently a working title.  Alongside the other main and vital witnesses, such as Frank Booth, the next door neighbour whom Glenn tragically died in front of and whose own spectacular statements clearly conflicts that of the official storyline and what many have already seen or read in the media as being true.  We have also met and interviewed Peter Molloy, the man who went back to Glenn’s home with Sabina, though sadly enough he was not willing to be filmed.  Though he has greatly helped us in our stern line of questioning and would like to take the opportunity to thank him for all his efforts.  He has since supplied us with his own personal account as to what happened that night in writing, which we will cover and examine further on.  In addition, we quote and show the brothers of Glenn, especially that of Jon Hollinshead, as he makes a scathing attack against those he blames to have allowed a “catalogue of errors” to have occurred and that led on to the avoidable death of his brother.  They predominately point the finger of blame at those higher up in the chain of command and the health authorities in general whose own “experts” came to the joint conclusion that Sabina was okay, fit and well to be released from hospital so soon after their assessment.

 

     We could clearly see what’s previously been reported about the coach journey and what allegedly happened at Keele services, has caused even more uncertainty and confusion with no definitive answers being found, until now that is, as we also explore the possibilities that the twins were not in fact ‘London bound’ after all.  The Hollinshead family can’t understand as to why the attending police officers to Keele services, responded the way they did.  Though since this time, we’ve now been able to uncover what really occurred that day.  In addition we can see and include the Staffordshire Police’s own annual report for 2009/10 that clearly contradicts the BBC’s documentary version of events.  We deliberately decided not to interview or include the officials seen in the Madness in the Fast Lane documentary, for we understood from the very start it would be very unlikely they would back the same line of thought as ours or that of the Hollinsheads’. 

 

     Our analysis tends to expose that there appears to be a deliberate cover-up, guised as the already mentioned catalogue of errors, that we can only suppose would have been orchestrated from the wings by an indistinguishable group of individuals who work for the powers that be in cases and circumstances such as this.  Whereas “they” deliberately gave the Eriksson twins the ‘green light’ and thus allowed this chain of events to occur.  I have direct evidence and personal experience of how this system works.  When at certain times and in some high profile cases, it is what they term; ‘Not in the Public Interest’, or; ‘...for matters of National Security’.  That assures specific practices are put into place and unorthodox procedures are carried out.  This appears to have been one of those ‘certain times’, as our evidence seems to indicate alongside and according to an anonymous informer, that if it’s true, the twins were but a mere tiny cog in a huge complex machine that had them embroiled within any one of a number of police undercover operations.  That if this was the case, it could have involved billions of pounds worth of drugs, and, or cutting agents [a mix that dilutes the original drugs] being smuggled to and from various countries and such places like the USA, South America, Ireland and the mainland’s of the UK, Sweden and Norway. 

 

     Further examination seem to indicate the prosecution’s case against Sabina was really weak.  It wasn’t until 10th June 2012 that we had the opportunity to study the pathologist reports about the cause of Glenn’s demise.  Incredibly, our findings blow the original version of events clean out of the water.  One of the doctors, Dr Shorrock, is the same pathologist who also carried out a post-mortem report on Jean Charles de Menezes, the Brazilin shot by police at Stockwell Underground station following the 7th July 2005 London bombings, and Ian Tomlinson, the newsvendor who died following an assault by a police officer at a G20 protest in London in 2008. 

 

     We’ve carried out and conducted some of our own experiments to help prove our point, and why we query the coroner’s reports.  In addition, we query the timings as to when the emergency services first arrived at the crime scene, following Glenn Hollinsheads’ murder.  We’ve questioned, how was it possible for the paramedics to be yards from where Sabina was, and arrived before the police, as she allegedly fled the murder scene the very same time Frank Booth must have been telephoning for an ambulance?  And we clear this problem up.  It is due to our own findings as to why we query and examine the prospects of fabricated evidence being suggested or used so as to try to strengthen the case against Sabina.  For it appears certain witnesses may not have really seen what they assume they had or even heard what Sabina and Glenn was supposed to have said. 

 

      We looked into the reason why and when Ursula might have left or fled the USA, and then went to Sabina’s home in Ireland?  And then, why as a couple they seemed to have fled that country, as opposed to having casually left it for the British mainland? And according to our findings we don’t believe they parted Ireland that weekend in question, despite police evidence seeming to suggest they must of.  Apart from the possible connections to drug smuggling, it’s been thought they could have been involved in some sort of religious cult, like that of “the Family”[1][2], now known as; The Family International [TFI], formed as the Children of God [COG], and look into these kind of matters further on.  At the time of the M6 incident, Sabina was wearing a visor with “Time to Believe” embroidered on it.  According to Peter Molloy, when they first encountered Sabina, she was praying outside a church.  Yet recent evidence has come to light that seems to put doubt on Peter’s version of events and we examine this further on.  The police reported she had become very religious whilst in prison.  The Eriksson twins appeared very fit and athletic, and has since been backed up to have been the case by their elder brother, whom we will discuss in The Eriksson’s chapter.  Their actions on the M6 motorway seems to put them into the realms of some type of Super Strength Soldier or Olympian.  It seems the case that when they were younger they had some kind of sports training.  Where the twins were raised, there’s a ski resort, with 16 pistes and 20 kilometres [12 miles] of cross country ski trails, so it very likely they are competent skiers.  In Sweden, National Service was mandatory up until 1st July 2010.  This was of course for men only.  In the Swedish Army, women serve together with the men.  They sleep together in the same tents and even shower together.  So it’s possible the twins had some form of military training.  They could have even been taught the techniques of stuntman-ship, acrobatics or gymnastics. 

 

     Yet despite all this, it’s their injuries or should I say, lack of them, that often tends to stump or bewilder most people who have watched the film footage, including ourselves, for we couldn’t understand or fathom out; ‘How did these women managed to escape with such minimal injuries and damage done to their bodies?’  And why it’s been alleged the already mentioned possibilities of them being some form of a ‘Super Strength Soldier’.[3][4]  And it is because of these rather out of the box submission of ideas, often construed as irrational thinking or logic, that we decided to probe into these matters and confront them head on and try our best to explain as to why so many people genuinely do believe there is something that doesn’t quite add up when it comes to the Eriksson twins body’s or injuries.   Yet they are explainable, though we know a certain fraction group of people will not be willing to accept these reasons and why we have covered these subjects more in-depth in the eBook, as this permits us to include another 22,000 plus words in the Appendix, and keep the printing costs down on the paperback, which is aimed at those who are not really interested or into “conspiracy theories” as such, and who wish to address the actual factual evidence and legal implications in this case.  We do not want to hinder our own findings by blurring all these issues together, when they are clearly separate debates and problems.   

 

     It has also been suggested, that the twins’ actions must have been triggered-off by some sort of ‘self-destruct’ mode.  That perhaps this achieved due to hypnosis or a form of brainwashing, or its been thought that they may have had microchips implanted within their brains or other parts of their body and were either programmed or remotely controlled to react the way that they did.  In the eBook, we show actual examples of people who claim this has happened to them, one is by a female addressing an American board of enquiry.  The twins bizarre behaviour certainly does seem to suggest they could be victims of some kind of modern day Project MK-Ultra program, which was the code name for a covert, illegal CIA human experimentation program run by the CIA in 1950s and 60s.[5] According to Peter Molloy, who was with Glenn when Sabina offered them cigarettes, he said that as soon as they put them to their mouths, she snatched them back away, claiming; “They could be poisoned”.  This type of suggestion can be found in a 1955 MK-Ultra document.[6] Though there is no other evidence that backs these theories up and why they are only mainly discussed in the Appendix section of the eBook, though we do briefly examine it in the paperback as well.  The inclusion of drugs being used, either knowingly or unknowingly by the twins, cannot be ruled out despite it being believed their blood tests proved negative, as we will explain this was not probably the case.